WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Ben Cardin and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) today joined Senators Mazie K. Hirono (D-Hawaii), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Ben Cardin (D-Md.), and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) in writing a letter to Deputy Inspector General Mary L. Kendall requesting that she investigate “the suppression of a Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion that was due to be completed and released in December 2017.” The letter specifically calls into question actions taken by David Bernhardt, the current nominee to become Secretary of the Interior, to suppress scientific data and follows up on a letter the Senators previously sent requesting the Deputy Inspector General monitor and investigate any “instances of potential alterations to scientific reports, documents, or communications produced by the Department of the Interior (DOI) as well as instances of political pressure influencing science at DOI.”

“Under the current administration DOI has repeatedly shown a willingness to completely disregard the work of career scientists and allow political appointees who are not subject matter experts to influence the decision-making process,” the Senators wrote. “In our previous letter, we said we had no reason to believe that the attacks on science and pressure by political appointees to alter science in order to advance the administration’s narrative would cease, and this report reinforces that conclusion. As such we request an investigation into the delayed release of the Fish and Wildlife Biological Opinion that was due for release over a year ago.”

The Senators requested the investigation after the New York Times published an article last week that detailed a series of documents from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service scientists who completed a comprehensive analysis showing several widely-used pesticides were so toxic they “‘jeopardize the continued existence’ of more than 1,200 endangered birds, fish, and other animals.” The documents also indicated top political appointees, led by Bernhardt, blocked the release of the opinion and “set in motion a new process intended to apply a much narrower standard to determine the risks from pesticides.” The documents exposing Bernhardt’s actions were obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request.

In September 2018, Cardin and Van Hollen joined colleagues in sending a letter to Deputy Inspector General Kendall to request she investigate allegations of political interference and alterations to scientific data at the DOI regarding a report by the National Park Service (NPS) on sea level rise. While that report was ultimately released without politically-influenced edits or alterations, the Senators continue to track DOI’s ongoing treatment of scientists and scientific experts.

The full text of the letter is available here and below.

Dear Ms. Kendall:

On September 28, 2018, we wrote to request that you monitor and investigate “instances of potential alterations to scientific reports, documents, or communications produced by the Department of the Interior (DOI) as well as instances of political pressure influencing science at DOI.” This letter was in reference to DOI’s alleged alterations of a National Park Service report on sea level rise. Unfortunately concerns remain regarding political interference over at DOI and thus today, we write again regarding DOI’s treatment of science and scientific experts and request an investigation specifically into the suppression of a Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion that was due to be completed and released in December 2017.

On March 26, 2019, the New York Times published an article titled, “Interior Nominee Intervened to Block Report on Endangered Species.” The article details a series of documents obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request highlighting how Fish and Wildlife Service scientists had completed a comprehensive analysis showing that several widely-used pesticides were so toxic that they “jeopardize the continued existence” of more than 1,200 endangered birds, fish, and other animals. The documents went on to show that top political appointees, led by DOI’s then-Deputy Secretary and now Secretary-nominee David Bernhardt, blocked the release of the opinion and “set in motion a new process intended to apply a much narrower standard to determine the risks from pesticides.”

Under the current administration DOI has repeatedly shown a willingness to completely disregard the work of career scientists and allow political appointees who are not subject matter experts to influence the decision-making process. In our previous letter, we said we had no reason to believe that the attacks on science and pressure by political appointees to alter science in order to advance the administration’s narrative would cease, and this report reinforces that conclusion. As such we request an investigation into the delayed release of the Fish and Wildlife Biological Opinion that was due for release over a year ago.

Thank you for your attention to this request.

Sincerely,

###